Towards Entanglement of Free-Electron Pairs and Free-Electron–Bound-Electron Systems

Invited Talk

A K Karnieli1

1 ECE Department, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

Seminar: S1 — Modern Trends in Laser Physics

Friday, 10 July 2026 · 13:30 – 13:55

Abstract

Free-electron quantum optics [1] explores quantum-coherent interactions between free-electron wavepackets, light, and matter, enabling ultrafast and deep-subwavelength studies of quantum correlations. A central achievement of the field has been the realization of electron–photon entanglement [2–5]. Beyond this, theory has predicted entanglement between free electrons and bound electrons [6,7], as well as between pairs of free electrons through long-range Coulomb interactions [8]. While classical correlations between free-electron pairs were recently observed experimentally [9,10], direct evidence of residual entanglement remains elusive [8]. Likewise, free-electron–bound-electron entanglement has yet to be experimentally demonstrated [11,12].

In this talk, I will show that entangled free-electron pairs leave distinct signatures in the emitted light that directly depend on their quantum state [13], providing a route for optical detection of free-electron entanglement. I will then discuss recent experiments showing that Coulomb-entangled electron pairs driven by external laser fields exhibit characteristic two-dimensional quantum-walk–like energy-correlation patterns [8], clearly different from separable states. Next, I will present a new mechanism in which elastic interactions with electromagnetic fields generate entangled electron energy-comb states [14]. Finally, I will discuss how engineered electromagnetic environments can strongly enhance free-electron–bound-electron interactions [15,16], bringing experimental observation of this form of entanglement closer to reality.

References

  1. R Ruimy, A Karnieli and I Kaminer, Nat. Phys. 21, 193 (2025)
  2. O Kfir, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 103602 (2019)
  3. G Arend, G Huang, A Feist, et al., Nat. Phys. 21, 1855 (2025)
  4. J-W Henke, H Jeng, M Sivis and C Ropers, arXiv: 2504.13047 (2025)
  5. P Rembold, S Beltrán-Romero, A Preimesberger, et al., arXiv: 2502.19536 (2025)
  6. R Ruimy, A Gorlach, C Mechel, N Rivera and I Kaminer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 233403 (2021)
  7. Z Zhao, X-Q Sun and S Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 233402 (2021)
  8. O Tziperman, D Nabben, R Ruimy, et al., Nat. Phys. 22, 763 (2026)
  9. R Haindl, A Feist, T Domröse, et al., Nat. Phys. 19, 1410 (2023)
  10. S Meier, J Heimerl and P Hommelhoff, Nat. Phys. 19, 1402 (2023)
  11. M Kolb, T Spielauer, T Weigner, arXiv: 2509.13904 (2025)
  12. J M Grzesik, D Catanzaro, C Roques-Carmes, et al., arXiv: 2508.13112 (2025)
  13. A Karnieli, N Rivera, A Arie and I Kaminer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060403 (2021)
  14. R Ruimy, et al., in preparation
  15. A Karnieli, S Tsesses, R Yu, et al., Sci. Adv. 9, add2349 (2023)
  16. J M Grzesik, A Karnieli, C Roques-Carmes, et al., arXiv: 2601.21385 (2026)